As a whistle-blower, I'm not a fan of conspiracies because they can be used to discredit you, and thus your personal claims as a whistle-blower.

I'm also not a fan of coincidence either. Lately I've been getting a strong intuition, which is based on personal knowledge of key facts, that Matt Taibbi, Glenn Greenwald & Lee Fang, were making strong appeals to Flynn & Bannon's key demographic; "neurotics". This demographic also bleeds into Project Veritas & James O'Keefe demographics which are largely built from their "base".

That made the IIA/PSYOP guy in me think if this was something happening generically and Taibbi & Co. were just fortunately in place?

There's nothing generic or natural about what amounts to mutiny at PV, which negs the question, was this generic, or Flynn wanting more "credible" assets under his authority?

If the claims made in this interview by Thomas Schoenberger, former owner of ShadowBox, are true, then I believe ALL of these "journalists" have a lot of explaining to do.

NO actual journalist obeying their Constitutional responsibility to protect 1st Amendment Press freedoms, shouldn't be needing ANY company like ShadowBox to clean up their past. Journalists should be open and transparent, owning their past. If they can't, they're in the wrong business.

I sensed something was off with these guys after Fang ghosted me without any explanation, and it seems my concerns may have been justified.

It is critical Matt Taibbi answer the claims of Thomas Schoenberger, which I would argue is in itself a potential motive for Fang to be pressured into dropping ShadowGate & the arrest of a fellow American journalist WHILE she was uploading the ShadowGate documentary.

If any of them refuse to address this, I believe for the good of the mission that Musk needs to replace Taibbi with someone less worried about clicks, and that understands the seriousness of the situation.

Share this video to Taibbi, Greenwald, Fang & Musk. Demand answers or accept your fate. I'm not a trained journalist and did my best to ask Thomas relevant questions and I believe he gave pretty specific answers for the vast majority of them. I can't speak as to the varsity of Thomas's claims, but I can say they fit well with what I've been seeing, which is dishonorable behavior by a lot of journalist. That is why I did this interview, but it is up to you as to the conclusions you make.

If you come to the same conclusion as I have thus far, please consider supporting my efforts.

Patrick Bergy